| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Chribba - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Disturbing....... Brock Nelson wrote: To those that posted ib4l Do you guys ejaculate when it does lock? Why? Do you want to watch? I'm not the type to kiss and tell. Oh yeah almost forgot: iB4l
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.04.09 03:56:00
|
2. My Apology - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The main problem with the current situation is that with new laws being added to the books (At least in the U.S.) the legal ramifications have to also be taken into effect, even if goons don't see it that way, and CCP also has to take things like ...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.27 12:24:00
|
3. My Apology - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is like an AA moment, the first step is to realize you have a problem. I was actually quite suprised to see an appology. Hopefully it isn't just a space politician appology, but lets face it, this isn't the first time something like this has ...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.27 11:15:00
|
4. Why so many christian references in this game? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Z'aan Pulsar wrote: It's future and all this crap like "new eden" are everywhere in EVE. Much more realistic scenario would be world that takes stuff from Chinese, Indian and African cultures, since by 2040 there is over 5 billion people in As...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.21 05:43:00
|
5. CCP do something about the suicide ganking problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Cosmos Serendipity wrote: Now note: I am not advocating PvP free as some are. I am just adding to the discussion on what could be done to get people into 0.0 to 0.4 so there is more pew pew Simple: increase the amount of pew-...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.12 11:03:00
|
6. CCP do something about the suicide ganking problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Darth Gustav wrote: Cosmos Serendipity wrote: baltec1 wrote: Cosmos Serendipity wrote: I've been in null, lived there for awhile, it was pretty safe in alliance held space.....or are you saying Goons now operate on NRDS? If not, why ...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.12 10:23:00
|
7. CCP do something about the suicide ganking problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Cosmos Serendipity wrote: I've been in null, lived there for awhile, it was pretty safe in alliance held space.....or are you saying Goons now operate on NRDS? If not, why not? It is only safe in null sec so long as the p...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.12 09:07:00
|
8. CCP do something about the suicide ganking problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: Cosmos Serendipity wrote: As it is null is safer than high sec ahahah sure why don't you come right down I've been in null, lived there for awhile, it was pretty safe in alliance held space.....or are you saying Goons now...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.12 08:10:00
|
9. CCP do something about the suicide ganking problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: Your idea discourages suicide ganking and punishes "offenders" with permanent banishment from hisec space. Get out. The 3 strike rule was an example, and yes it would discourage it, of course being a goon, you would find ways...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.12 06:11:00
|
10. CCP do something about the suicide ganking problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: Cosmos Serendipity wrote: Part of the problem is the punishment system has a lot to be desired. Taking insurance payouts from gankers were just common sense but imo doesn't really go far enough. Imortals should have a better ...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.12 04:48:00
|
11. CCP do something about the suicide ganking problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Part of the problem is the punishment system has a lot to be desired. Taking insurance payouts from gankers were just common sense but imo doesn't really go far enough. Imortals should have a better punishment system than the one Eve has. For in...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.03.12 04:02:00
|
12. Mining- Why it needs to be saved, and how to do it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
J Kunjeh wrote: Cosmos Serendipity wrote: The only catch I can see is if there is too much done, (f.ex. having to reposition and all) would be how much more difficult mining in low/null sec would become. You always want to be aligned to a po...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.01.25 15:43:00
|
13. Mining- Why it needs to be saved, and how to do it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The only catch I can see is if there is too much done, (f.ex. having to reposition and all) would be how much more difficult mining in low/null sec would become. You always want to be aligned to a pos or station and ready to warp at a moments noti...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.01.25 12:39:00
|
14. What's the story behind the Amarr head plates? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I heard it was space tinfoil.....
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.01.20 00:26:00
|
15. Mining- Why it needs to be saved, and how to do it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I like the op's idea's, maybe with a few more tweaks. Removal of rat loot drops replaced with higher bounties Change reprecessing to give a new material (Pot metal) that can be used in the process of building instead of minerals also making min...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2012.01.20 00:17:00
|
16. The first thing I did with the captains quarters was .... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stumbled over to the balcany, admired my ship as I pee'd over the rail, then... Originally by: Dr Zuma Turn it off.
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2011.06.22 17:35:00
|
17. Give us back the Hanger View - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Commissar Kate It should be DOCK > HANGER VIEW > CLICK BUTTON ON NEOCOM (if you so desire to) > Captains Quarters/Incarna +1
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2011.06.22 16:12:00
|
18. Poll : Why are you in Highsec / Lowsec / 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. High Sec 2. Trying to build up my corp with enough active members of all types to make the move to 0.0 3. A little of everything. Mining, industrial, invention, ratting. 4. Once I get my corps membership up and get them a little PvP trainin...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2008.02.13 22:18:00
|
19. Regarding cloaking ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Duke Val'Doom I don't think it would hurt anything if they removed local all together, it's only used for spamming purposes anyways. Even the "macro hunters" don't bother to try to talk to you any more before they try to ga...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2008.01.31 12:44:00
|
20. Regarding cloaking ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Cosmos Serendipity on 31/01/2008 12:17:57 Originally by: Reem Fairchild If you seriously believe that that quote is to be taken completely literally and applying to all forms of play, then I await your posts about the evil...
- by Cosmos Serendipity - at 2008.01.31 12:17:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |